Logo: folc.ca: For our Lamont County

Industrial and Community Development for Our Lamont County

| Home | In The News | Contact Us | Our Blog | Search this Website | Share

 

ISSUES OF CONCERN:

Industrial Heartland Expansion

Visible Air Pollution
IHE Main Page

Maxim's Deerland Peaking Station

Maxim Index
News on Maxim
Proposed Power Station at Deerland (North of Bruderheim)

NAOSC Upgrader
News on NAOSC
Proposed Bitumen-Upgrader Facility near Bruderheim

HAZCO

News on HAZCO
Proposed Waste-Sulphur-Storage and -Handling Facility
Environmental Impact of Sulphur
Health-Impact of Sulphur
Sulphur Poisoning
Sulphur Fires
   

Shell CCS Project
News and information on Shell's CCS Project

GENERAL

Table of Contents for Website of folc.ca
Site Map
Post comments on any items or issues on this web page or at folc.ca that concern you to the LCE Blog, the blog for folc.ca
Mail to FOLC or to folc.ca
Air Quality, Flaring and Monitoring
Glossary of Sulphur-related Terms used in the Petroleum Industry
Links
References - Bibliography
folc.ca Site Stats

You are visitor

at the website of folc.ca
since July 16, 2005



Click to get your own widget


 

 
 
 
 

folc.ca's comment on HAZCO's answer to FAQ #31


Note: The background text in the following was copied from the Frequently-asked Questions page at HAZCO's website, Nov. 2, 2005.  HAZCO's answers to "frequently asked questions" deserve further comments.  Those comments are inserted where required in HAZCO's text and are shown on yellow background.

From HAZCO's FAQ web page (quoted verbatim):

FAQ #31. How significant will this project be to the local tax base?

The estimated taxes for the proposed project will be approximately $100,000.  This value is based on a preliminary estimate and would need to be finalized based on a formal property tax assessment of the site.



Comment:

The tax amount HAZCO refers to is an annual tax figure.  It cannot be expected that the County of Lamont can retain more than$60,000 to $65,000 of that annual tax income derived from the HAZCO sulphur plant (e. g.: The Industrial Heartland Development Association receives a good cut from that tax income). 

It seems that the costs of maintaining the County's infrastructure in the face of increased traffic loads posed by traffic to and from the HAZCO site can be expected to be far in excess of the pitifully small amount of taxes raised from a prime area of industrial land that would be far better to be put to use for purposes far better than the disposal of a hazardous waste like sulphur.

There is a more detailed discussion of what the tax revenues would mean within the context of the impact HAZCO's sulphur plant would have on our County and our future.  Check FAQ #11.

Next FAQ

Back to index page to HAZCO's FAQs

Back to index page for Hazco sulphur storage site pages

Back to Bruderheim Main Page

Created Nov. 4, 2005